APPLAUSE, APPLAUSE – AT 9:08 A.M. ET: One of the standard lines of the climate-change left is that those who question global warming are kooks, crackpots, oil-industry shills, and worse. But what do you say about a Nobel laureate in physics who asks questions, and takes intellectual aim at President Obama? I love this. From Daily Caller:
In 2008, Dr. Ivar Giaever joined over 70 Nobel Science Laureates in endorsing Barack Obama for president, but seven years later the Nobel Prize winner now stands against the president on global warming.
“I would say that basically global warming is a non-problem,” Giaever, who won the Nobel for physics in 1973, told an audience at the Lindau Nobel Laureate meeting earlier this month.
Giaever ridiculed Obama for stating that “no challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.” The physicist called it a “ridiculous statement” and that Obama “gets bad advice” when it comes to global warming.
“I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. Dead wrong,” Giaever said.
Giaever was a professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute’s School of Engineering and School of Science and received the Nobel Prize for physics for his work on quantum tunneling. Giaever said he was “horrified” about the science surrounding global warming when he conducted research on the subject in 2012.
Ironically, just four years earlier he signed a letter with more than 70 other Nobel winners saying the “country urgently needs a visionary leader” and that “Senator Barack Obama is such a leader, and we urge you to join us in supporting him.”
But by 2011, Giaever left the American Physical Society because it officially stated that “the evidence is incontrovertible … [g]lobal warming is occurring.” The Society also pushed for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
“Global warming really has become a new religion,” Giaever said. “Because you cannot discuss it. It’s not proper."
COMMENT: He is absolutely right. It is a new religion, or a new religious doctrine within the religion of liberalism. One does not question. One does not oppose. One goes along. Of course, if one must drive one is permitted to go to gas stations, as long as one mumbles something about carbon. Mumbling is acceptable.
There are plenty of scientists who've expressed doubts about global warming. They get nowhere. The high priests of politics have spoken.
July 8, 2015 |